neurosciencestuff:


Would you make your DNA and health data public if it may help cure disease?
The 39-year-old Toronto professional is the brave or, perhaps, foolhardy Canadian volunteer who will be first to go public this week in a project that will reveal the coded secrets hidden in her genome, the six billion chemical units of her DNA.
They may include not only her susceptibility to diseases such as cancer but the levels of her propensities to alcoholism, depression or obesity, or even personality traits such as risk-taking. She will also provide the personal context required to make sense of the biological data – her age, height, weight; medical records; details about how she lives, works and plays; and even her photo if she’s game.
This information – everything but her name and address – will be placed on an online database that will be open and available to anyone in the world. Even in this digital age of perpetual show and tell, exposing oneself so completely amounts to a molecular full monty: Even without a name attached, any participant might be identifiable.
Ms. Davies is making a leap of faith that at least 100,000 of her fellow citizens are also being asked to take – even though Canadian law has no strict guidelines on how this confidential knowledge might be used or misused by any insurance company, employer, police force or identity thief.

Read more

I work with confidential data all the time, sometimes the stuff I work with does have names and addresses, and let me just say that when you go through thousands of files, remembering anything specific is really rare. I need access to confidential data relating to healthy behaviours to do research to help improve peoples lives - having data already available makes things so very much easier research wise. Can this data be misused? Of course. But I worry about that so much less after working on the other side of things. The reality is it is pretty difficult to misuse these types of data, and much easier (though still somewhat difficult) to use it for beneficial activities like research.

neurosciencestuff:

Would you make your DNA and health data public if it may help cure disease?

The 39-year-old Toronto professional is the brave or, perhaps, foolhardy Canadian volunteer who will be first to go public this week in a project that will reveal the coded secrets hidden in her genome, the six billion chemical units of her DNA.

They may include not only her susceptibility to diseases such as cancer but the levels of her propensities to alcoholism, depression or obesity, or even personality traits such as risk-taking. She will also provide the personal context required to make sense of the biological data – her age, height, weight; medical records; details about how she lives, works and plays; and even her photo if she’s game.

This information – everything but her name and address – will be placed on an online database that will be open and available to anyone in the world. Even in this digital age of perpetual show and tell, exposing oneself so completely amounts to a molecular full monty: Even without a name attached, any participant might be identifiable.

Ms. Davies is making a leap of faith that at least 100,000 of her fellow citizens are also being asked to take – even though Canadian law has no strict guidelines on how this confidential knowledge might be used or misused by any insurance company, employer, police force or identity thief.

Read more

I work with confidential data all the time, sometimes the stuff I work with does have names and addresses, and let me just say that when you go through thousands of files, remembering anything specific is really rare. I need access to confidential data relating to healthy behaviours to do research to help improve peoples lives - having data already available makes things so very much easier research wise. Can this data be misused? Of course. But I worry about that so much less after working on the other side of things. The reality is it is pretty difficult to misuse these types of data, and much easier (though still somewhat difficult) to use it for beneficial activities like research.

11

December

683 notes

This photo was reblogged from neurosciencestuff and originally by neurosciencestuff.

  1. lunarmystery reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  2. zrsfizzybongs reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. dermoosealini reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  4. unbeknownstlove reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  5. artntyouglad reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  6. pigmediacraft reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  7. lespetitesbaleines reblogged this from azothian
  8. azothian reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  9. aboxfullofdarkness reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  10. jiyaajale reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  11. azzameiluj reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  12. myhunger reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  13. mypolarity reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  14. hillynakz reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  15. tommizzy reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    NO!
  16. carolinaguida reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. giffirt reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  18. strangelypretty reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. evesapples reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  20. lostandinsecure reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  21. thekingdomwashere reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  22. whats-the-antimatter reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  23. allwehavetodecide reblogged this from harrywhodee-knee
  24. harrywhodee-knee reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  25. meowruna reblogged this from tumblrradararchive
  26. negrilbeach reblogged this from ebruulufer
  27. ebruulufer reblogged this from clatko
  28. 0m3garuby reblogged this from varicella-zoster
  29. varicella-zoster reblogged this from neurosciencestuff